If the American Nation does officially become part of the dustbin of history, replaced by an anti-White, multi-racial proletariat manipulated by a technocratic totalitarian system of management, perhaps the most important reason for its demise will be the stubborn faith placed in conservatives by a large chunk of the White middle and working class for over 50 years despite overwhelming evidence that conservatism, as represented by the Republican Party, organizations like the Heritage Foundation, and media outlets like Fox News, is just as much their enemy as their open leftist ones. As social media monopolies openly move to censor nationalist, populist, and yes, even some conservative opinions from the internet, the good old “loyal opposition” does nothing about it, even though the Republicans control Congress and most state legislatures, and the White House, the current inhabitant of which is supposedly a great friend of populists and nationalists. As James Kirkpatrick writes in “’If You Fight Your Enemies They Win’ – Why Conservatism Inc. Won’t Defend Free Speech”: “Conservatism Inc. operatives say the same kinds of (inoffensive) things about technology oligopolies. The Beltway Right acknowledges censorship, demonization, and marginalization by tech mega-companies such as Google, Facebook, and Twitter, but doesn’t want to do anything about it. Thus, even though the Republican Party controls both Congress and the White House, the conservative and nationalist online activists who won Donald Trump the presidency in an unprecedented upset are being systematically suppressed and ‘the Conservative movement’ is saying nothing. For example, in a recent interview with Breitbart, Klon Kitchen, the Heritage Foundation’s senior research fellow for technology, said Facebook has the right to censor whomever it wants. ‘I think Facebook is a private company,’ Kitchen stated. ‘[T]he Heritage Foundation is going to be very clear about a private company’s right to organize and conduct its business as it sees fit.’ In a separate piece, Breitbart’s Bokhari denounced both Heritage and the Libertarian think tank ‘TechFreedom,’ another group opposing regulation of Facebook and other social networking giants. Bokhari argued Establishment conservatives are failing to understand the core issue: “None of these free market geniuses have grasped that Google and Facebook aren’t just monopolies (any first-grade economics teacher can tell you that a market dominated by monopolies is not ‘free’), they are unique in the vast power they have over the flow of information. No other organization in history has had the power to shape opinion, control public discourse, and influence democratic voters. As the last Radio VDARE argued, the power of these mega-companies creates the potential for a ‘managed democracy’ such as Vladimir Putin’s Russia is alleged to be. Indeed, the situation in America is more tyrannical and more dangerous. In Russia, the people at least know who to hold responsible if the system fails them. In America, because the actors controlling the flow of information are not technically part of the government, there is an illusion of a ‘marketplace of ideas,’ when there is actually just one narrative being promoted. Only a cynic can speak of ‘democracy’ when the public’s access to information, and therefore the public’s view of reality, can be determined by the push of a button. As even mainstream media journalists now concede, Facebook (and its algorithm) now has the power to direct massive amounts of traffic to whatever companies it wants. Because no one actually knows what the algorithm is and because it continually changes, Facebook essentially has the power to destroy any company it desires. . . The endgame is obvious. Heritage is in a position of huge power because of this decision. As it is, after all, the organization that fired Jason Richwine for realistically discussing immigration policy certainly won’t protect free speech as such. Instead, it will seek protection for Conservatism Inc. by telling Facebook to purge, censor, and deplatform nationalists and populists, thus continuing the defining tradition of the useless Beltway Right. Conservatism Inc. is just as much of an enemy to free speech as are Google and Facebook. The answer: government or judicial action to protect freedom of debate online. All legal speech needs protection, and as the late Christopher Hitchens famously argued (paraphrasing John Stuart Mill) those who speak differently don’t just deserve the right to speak, ‘That person’s right to speak must be given extra protection.’ But the fact that the Heritage Foundation isn’t championing a principled view of freedom of speech suggests it is more interested in increasing its own power, not in protecting Americans’ fundamental liberties or, for that matter, any chance Republicans can ever win another election. As demographics continue to change because of mass immigration, the White cultural norm of freedom of speech will come under increasing pressure. If it is to be preserved, there must be action now. If there is not action, America will no longer be a free country but as just another autocracy — one with a ruling caste far more unaccountable and hostile to the host population than anything that exists in Moscow.” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . During the 2016 election, Hillary Clinton received more than 85% of all campaign contributions made by Facebook employees, while Democrats took 93.1% of the total compared to 5.8% for Republicans and 1.1% for third party candidates. As the website Chateau Heartiste notes, “America’s arguably two most powerful institutions – tech and media – are anti-White left wing to the core. Floor to rafters staffed by leftists, run by leftists, and owned by leftists. This is very bad for democracy. No way can we sustain the fiction of a working republic with an IngSoc thumb firmly on the scale of fairness, free speech, and objectivity. As I’ve been saying for a while, the only guaranteed solution to this problem of leftoid control of the command centers of America is a mass culling of them from the ranks of the media and, we may as well add, from Silicon Valley technopolies. There really is no other solution. We won’t change their minds; we won’t convince them of mercy toward the dissident voices they censor and silence. We can only defeat them, totally, utterly, mercilessly, and run them out of power on a rail(car). It’s the only way to be sure. Here’s hoping, once again, that Trump or his surrogates read this blog and slip in the world ‘cull’ in one of his morning tweetshivs to subtly acknowledge the influence this blog has on their thinking, and to signal their commitment to the necessary culling, by whatever means.” . . . . . . . . . . . Sorry, Chateau Heartiste, but there’s no evidence whatsoever that President Trump is ready to do any “culling” other than to more of his core campaign promises. At an appearance in the Midwest, Trump promised a large new influx of migrant workers, which means Mexicans, who were originally allowed into the Southwest but are now found throughout the country in low paid jobs. In typical brash Trumpese, the president told his audience, “For the farmers, OK, it’s going to get good, and we’re going to let your guest workers come in, because we’re going to have strong borders, but we have to have your workers come in. We have to let people in. They’re going to be guest workers, they’re going to come in, they’re going to work on your farms, we’re going to have the H-2Bs come in, we’re going to have a lot of things happening. . . We need people to be able to come into our country, do your jobs, help you on the farms, and then they go out, they’re going to leave. Guest workers, we’re going to take care of that. Guest workers. Don’t we agree? We have to have them. We have to have them.” As to Trump’s claim that the new influx of “guest workers” would then be ordered to leave the country – that has happened exactly zero times since The Great Replacement began in earnest with the Immigration Act of 1965 and it won’t start under President Snake Oil. . . . . . . . . . . . Most Trump voters wanted change, not the same old same old. Little did they know they elected Mitt Romney, not Donald Trump. Of Trump’s first year in office, Romney responded to a question from a voter in Utah by calling it “better than expected,” adding, “His first year is very similar to things I’d have done my first year. The things he’s actually done have been better than I expected.” Romney quickly added, however, that he would continue to oppose the president if he said something the former Massachusetts governor viewed as “racist” or “divisive.” So other than his “tweets,” it might as well be Mitt Romney, or Jeb Bush sitting in the Oval Office. . . . . . . . . Ann Coulter, who is much more of a populist and nationalist than a conservative and was one of Trump’s biggest supporters during 2016, recently wrote a scathing column mocking him. Excerpts from “3-D Chess: It Only Looks Like Trump is Throwing Away His Presidency!”: “I can’t wait to see Trump’s next move in his game of ‘3-D chess’! You see, it only looks like Trump is The Worst Negotiator God Ever Created. Instead of telling Democrats, ‘I won’t even talk about DACA until we have the border wall,’ Trump has repeatedly given up the wall, aka The Central Promise of His Campaign, Without Which He Would Not Be in the White House. He has now signed a spending bill that, if it actually did what it claims to do, prohibits him from building the wall, hiring any new ICE agents capable of making arrests, and building any new detention facilities for illegal aliens. The strange thing is, as commander in chief, he doesn’t need congressional authority to do any of these things. But he obviously doesn’t know that. Why? BECAUSE HE’S PLAYING 3-D CHESS! Instead of making even a fake effort and forcing Democrats to get up off the couch to vote against the wall, Trump cleverly leapt to the front of the anti-Trump parade and pretended it was all his idea. “I told Sen. Schumer: I WANT AMNESTY! I was very clear! Look at him, running around like a loser doing my bidding.’ Trump’s main response to a bill that actively prohibits him from keeping his central campaign promise was to denounce Congress for not sending him a bill legalizing ‘Dreamers.’ Which also breaks a campaign promise. It’s all part of the act, you fools! Trump is making the Democrats think that, even though they don’t have the House, the Senate or the White House, he needs Chuck Schumer’s permission before moving a muscle. Carefully observe the master. He gives up everything and — in exchange — gets NOTHING. See? . . . Obviously, a blue wave this fall is much more likely now. That’s the plan, morons. Just wait and see how they like it when the GOP gets wiped out in the midterms. Sure, we’ll get all the heinous PC policies we would have gotten under Hillary. But Trump is thinking three moves ahead. He could make history by being only the third president ever impeached. Top that, Obama! Only a chump would complain about Trump cheerfully doing a 180 on everything he campaigned for. If Trump voters are upset, it’s on them, not on him. I was there! At every single rally during the campaign, Trump would whip the crowd into a frenzy over the wall, deporting illegals and no more ‘stupid wars’ — but he was always VERY careful to end his speeches by saying: Unless, of course, anyone who represents conventional Republican thinking disagrees, in which case, I will do none of this. I can’t wait to see what comes next! Just hang on to your hats, because while you’re all playing checkers, Trump is playing 3-D chess.” . . . . . . . . . . . What’s almost as pathetic as Trump’s “3-D chess” moves against his own campaign promises is that the Democrats have nothing to offer most Americans in the upcoming midterm elections yet will probably rack up resounding victories in November thanks to Trump and Republican Party conservatives. Mike Whitney, the left-populist writer for Counterpunch.org who is often worth reading, observes: “The Democrats have decided to double-down on a political strategy that has divided the country, undermined confidence in public elections, alienated their progressive base and increased the chances of a violent clash with Russia. On Friday, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) filed a lawsuit charging the Russian government, the Trump campaign and Julian Assange of conspiring to sabotage the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton. The 66-page legal complaint is a politically-motivated smokescreen intended to divert attention from the fact that that Dems have abandoned any pretense of representing the interests of working class people. The party leadership is now fully-committed to pursuing an elitist, anti-Russia, anti-Trump agenda that lacks any progressive component and which is entirely based on a ludicrous conspiracy theory for which there is not a shred of hard evidence. Simply put: The lawsuit is the last disgraceful nail in the coffin of a thoroughly-corrupted political organization that has lost all credibility and clearly outlived its shelf-life. The Democrats are now the party of Hillary Clinton, John Brennan and James Clapper. They represent the narrow interests of the Intelligence Agencies, the Pentagon, the foreign policy establishment and Wall Street. The reason why Barack Obama never prosecuted any of the bankers who precipitated the financial crisis and plunged the economy into the deepest slump since the Great Depression, is because they represent the party’s core constituency, the rapacious, obscenely-wealthy mandarins who grease the wheels on Capitol Hill, pull the political puppet-strings, and implement the belligerent policies that keep the country mired in one bloody conflict after the other. . . This, of course, is the same sketchy fairytale the Dems have been reiterating for the last year and a half. So far, none of the main allegations have been verified, in fact, to date, there’s not even a reasonable basis for believing that a crime has been committed which means that this massive investigation that has tied up both Houses of Congress and a Special Counsel for more than 18 months doesn’t even meet minimal probable cause requirements. It’s beyond outrageous, it is a criminal misuse of government resources to pursue a political vendetta that serves the exclusive interests of the losing party. That is not the way democracy is supposed to work. The Dems do not expect to find any incriminating evidence that will tie Trump to Moscow nor is that even the point of the lawsuit. The real objective is to increase public suspicion of Trump thus tainting the party’s leader as an election-rigging foreign collaborator. The Dems believe that their character assassination campaign — which begin prior to the 2016 with the compiling of the nefarious “Trump Dossier” — remains their best path to victory in the midterms.” In a rational country, the Democrats would be on their deathbed, but in the U.S. political looney bin, thanks to the antics of Trump and the Beltway Conservatives, they’ll likely be the big winners in November. But it’s supposed to be this way. Amerika is a rigged, soft totalitarian system with the government, big business, big media, academia, foundations, NGOs, and all the rest of the institutions of control working hand-in-glove to keep the masses ignorant and without effective political representation. And it’s important to always keep in mind the ticking time bomb – the ongoing “Great Replacement” of Whites, which soon will make not only the federal government but many state legislatures as radically leftist as that of California, once a bedrock conservative state but which became the most far-left state in the country as the White population was overwhelmed by non-Whites. As Pat Buchanan notes, “At the national level, Democrats will turn 2018 into a referendum on the Trump persona and Trump presidency. . . White voters, who tend to vote Republican, continue to decline as a share of the population. Peoples of color, who vote 70% to 90% Democratic in presidential elections, are now nearly 40% of the nation. Mass migration into America is re-enforcing that trend. Moreover, millennials, who have many elections ahead of them, are more liberal than seniors, who have fewer elections ahead and are the GOP base.” The next time Hillary’s anti-White coalition wins on the national level, their number one priority will be to make sure that they never lose again, and given Trump’s betrayal on all of his core campaign promises, they won’t have a difficult time making that happen. . . . . . . . . . . The key to decoding U.S. foreign policy, to the extent there’s any rationality to it, is to understand that Washington is determined to maintain indefinitely a “unipolar” world in which it is the master that dictates to all other nations, just as post-9/11 a “unitary” system has been constructed domestically, in which all institutions of power and control have to a large degree merged in their aims and methods of management and exploitation. A two-part series by Michael Krieger of the website Liberty Blitzkrieg.com is an excellent primer on what is at stake, in sharp contrast to the infantile cartoonish propaganda fed to Americans by the fake news media. Excerpts:
Read the rest of this article and all Nationalist Times articles by subscribing to America’s best political newspaper: http://www.americanfreedomunion.com/?page_id=11
Or subscribe by snail mail for the ridiculously low price of just $19! That’s less than one-third the regular subscription rate! Or subscribe for two years for just $37. Send your subscription (check, money order or cash) to: The Nationalist Times, P.O. Box 281, Wildwood, PA 15091.
This great offer is for new subscribers only; it is not a renewal rate for current subscribers.