Modern liberalism discourages any kind of discrimination, in any sense of that word, unless it is directed at White Christians. If extended to every aspect of life, this principle will ultimately destroy every human society and institution, as it is now in the process of doing. This malignancy is one crisis our civilization faces.
Liberal ideology manifests in tolerance and non-discrimination as the ruling principles of society, the principles to which all other principles must yield. A society which cannot discriminate between itself and other societies will cease to exist. In order to exist, we must be able to say we are us, which means that we are different from the others.
These liberal principles are very simple, but radical in the extreme. Yet very few people — even hard-line conservatives — are aware of them: Or, if they are aware, they are in dire fear of mentioning them. Instead of opposing the primary principle of non-discrimination, conservatives oppose its secondary manifestations such as multiculturalism and political correctness.
Let’s say we got rid of multiculturalism and political correctness: Would that end Muslim immigration? No, multiculturalism is not the source of Muslim immigration. The source is the liberal belief that we must not discriminate against any people on the basis of their race, ethnicity, culture, religion, etc. This was the guiding principle behind the 1965 Immigration Act and the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
The latter basically said that all discrimination is wrong, period. No one in today’s society is willing to oppose this utterly ridiculous idea. Few have had the nerve to question Muslim immigration or recommend that it be curtailed or ended, except for restrictions on immigrants from countries promoting terrorism. If we hadn’t experienced a recent spate of terrorist incidents, insidious Muslim immigration — incompatible with our basic principles — would go on without practical opposition.
Few writers and pundits who have the nerve to say that Islam is a mortal danger to our society will publicly advocate stopping or reducing Muslim immigration. This is because the dominant liberal dogma claims it is morally wrong for people to have a critical view of a foreign group, or to want to exclude that group.
Modern liberalism’s principle of forced equality dictates that Muslim immigrants — who could never successfully assimilate — must be permitted to flood our society, changing its very nature. It also rejects any standard morality for mankind to follow, thus banishing God as the source of moral principles. Their ideology dictates that those who make these types of distinctions must be banished from polite society, or at least be banished from a mainstream career.
Read the rest of this article and all Nationalist Times articles by subscribing to America’s best political newspaper: http://www.testerwebsites.com/AFU/subscribe/
Or subscribe by snail mail for the ridiculously low price of just $19! That’s less than one-third the regular subscription rate! Or subscribe for two years for just $37. Send your subscription (check, money order or cash) to: The Nationalist Times, P.O. Box 281, Wildwood, PA 15091.
This great offer is for new subscribers only; it is not a renewal rate for current subscribers.